Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Evaluating Sources

This guide will help you in learning how to evaluate the sources you find.

Comparing Scholarly, Popular, and Trade/Technical Periodicals

Table comparing scholarly, popular, and trade periodicals
  Scholarly Popular Trade
  • Report original research findings or theories
  • Inform or entertain on current events
  • News or other information for in people who work in the field
  • Experts or researchers in the field
  • Often more than one author
  • Affiliations are listed
  • Journalists or freelance writers
  • Journalists with subject expertise
  • Practitioners in the field
  • Other experts in the field
  • People researching the topic, such as professors and students
  • General public
  • Practitioners in the field, researchers, or general public interested in the topic
  • Specialized jargon for the field
  • Easy to understand
  • Jargon avoided or defined
  • Technical language specific to the field
Sources or Documentation
  • Sources heavily cited
  • Rarely cite sources
  • May mention other articles or reports
  • Sources may be cited
  • Formal and structured.
  • May have tables or graphs
  • Limited illustrations to only those that are necessary
  • No advertising 
  • Varies, but visually appealing
  • Many advertisements 
  • Visually appealing
  • May include illustrations, charts, and graphs
  • Typically experts in the field
  • If peer-reviewed, then by peer scholars in the field
  • Staff editors who evaluate articles 
  • Staff editors who evaluate articles
  • Advances in Bioinformatics
  • AANA Journal
  • Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • The Lancet
  • Chicago Sun-Times
  • New York Times
  • People
  • Sports Illustrated
  • Psychology Today
  • Scrubs Magazine
  • AdWeek 
  • Backstage